Hyperplasticity and the Double‑Edged Power of Excessive Adaptability... and means of further understanding hyperneuroplasticity

By Dr. Patty Gently on September 8, 2025

hyperplacticity

Bright Insight Support Network founder and president Dr. Patricia Gently supports gifted and twice-exceptional adults in their own autopsychotherapy through identity exploration, structured reflection, and alignment with inner values. A writer, educator, and 2e adult, Dr. Patty centers depth, integrity, and complexity in all aspects of her work.

Enjoy this and other posts by @thegentleheretic on Substack!

Introduction

Plasticity is one of the most powerful ideas in science, describing a system’s ability to adapt, reshape, and reorganize. From how our brains rewire after injury to how materials deform under stress, plasticity is central to adaptation. Yet when that adaptability is excessive, the concept of hyperplasticity emerges as an intensified, sometimes destabilizing form of plasticity.

Although not as widely known as the term neuroplasticity, hyperplasticity appears in diverse domains from autism neuroscience to Alzheimer's research, and from regenerative biology to materials engineering. Across these fields, the concept of hyperplasticity consistently embodies a dual character: potential for remarkable resilience, paired with the risk of instability. In this article, we will explore where hyperplasticity appears, why it is invoked, the balance of its outcomes, and how the framing of hyperneuroplasticity furthers our understanding of neurodivergent profiles.

Hyperplasticity in Neuroscience and Psychology

The brain is perhaps the most vivid setting in which hyperplasticity has been investigated. While neuroplasticity is widely known as the brain’s capacity to rewire itself through learning and experience, hyperplasticity refers to cases where this adaptability is unusually pronounced. Neuroscientists have applied the term to describe both the striking capacities and the vulnerabilities found in autism, dementia subtypes, and sensory processing differences. This section explores how hyperplasticity is identified in neurological research, the methods used to study it, and the ways it can simultaneously serve as a strength and a liability.

Autism and Hyperplasticity

Several human and animal model studies suggest that hyperplasticity is a hallmark in autism. Autistic individuals exhibit significantly greater long-term potentiation (LTP, a process where neurons strengthen their connections) responses in visually elicited evoked potentials compared to non-autistic controls. For instance, autistic participants showed a notably larger N160 amplitude (a negative-going component of visual event-related potentials occurring around 160 ms after stimulus onset, often linked to early perceptual processing and here used as a marker of LTP), highlighting differences in synaptic responsiveness (Kirk et al., 2013). A randomized crossover study with 31 autistic and 30 matched control adults found that both long-term potentiation (LTP, a process where neurons strengthen their connections) and long-term depression (LTD, a process where neurons weaken their connections) were significantly increased in the autistic group, effectively affirming hyperplasticity. Researchers noted that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS, a noninvasive brain stimulation technique) could help explore ways of stabilizing this responsiveness without framing autism itself as something to cure (Janssen et al., 2021).

Research using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), a noninvasive brain stimulation technique, suggests that such stimulation may modulate aspects of neuroplasticity linked to autistic experience (Enticott et al., 2015). The valproic acid (VPA, a medication that, when used prenatally in animal models, can induce autism-like traits) rodent model also reveals cellular hyperplasticity, evidenced by significantly elevated LTP (a process where neurons strengthen their connections) in neocortex and amygdala following stimulation (Rinaldi et al., 2008). Taken together, these findings suggest that hyperplasticity in autism may underpin both distinctive strengths (such as learning adaptability and resilience) and challenges (including sensory overload and circuit instability). Rather than pathologizing difference, this body of research can be read as further evidence of the diverse ways autistic brains adapt, thrive, and sometimes struggle in a world not built for them.

Hyperplasticity in Sensory Processing Research

Emerging work investigates whether sensory areas beyond the motor cortex, such as the primary sensory cortex (S1, the brain’s main hub for touch and body sensations), also exhibit hyperplasticity in autism. One 2024 protocol proposes using TMS-EEG (a method combining magnetic stimulation with electrical recording, like knocking on the brain’s door and listening for the echo) to assess S1 plasticity and test whether rTMS can safely reduce it. The authors note they previously observed motor cortex hyperplasticity in autistic adults, which rTMS attenuated (Gowen et al., 2024). This finding suggests that heightened adaptability in the sensory systems may help explain both the strengths and struggles experienced by autistic individuals, such as heightened musical or artistic sensitivity, exceptional attention to fine detail, or deep focus on areas of interest, along with sensory overload or difficulties with transitions between tasks or environments. These contrasts make hyperplasticity a key piece in understanding the bigger picture of neurodivergent experience.

Hyperplasticity in Cellular and Molecular Biology

In pathology and regenerative contexts, hyperplasticity conveys both function and risk. For instance, hyperplastic tissue proliferation, which is adaptive in wound healing, can also veer toward uncontrolled, precancerous growth. This duality matters because it shows how the very mechanisms that enable healing and regeneration can, without regulation, become drivers of disease. Recognizing this tension helps explain why hyperplasticity is central to cancer biology as well as regenerative medicine, highlighting the fine line between repair and pathology (Hanahan & Weinberg, 2011).

Alzheimer’s research also highlights hyperplasticity as a defining feature in some disease subtypes. In particular, neuronal hyperplasticity has been identified as a biomarker for an Alzheimer’s subgroup characterized by excessive synaptic remodeling. While this remodeling may initially help the brain compensate for neuronal loss, it can also fuel tau pathology (the abnormal build-up and spread of tau protein tangles in the brain that disrupts communication between neurons) and accelerate disease progression. Large-scale proteomic studies have identified a neuronal hyperplasticity subtype of Alzheimer’s, showing that this pattern of excessive remodeling can be detected long before clinical symptoms appear (Tijms et al., 2020). This makes hyperplasticity in Alzheimer’s both a potential source of short-term resilience and a driver of long-term decline, underscoring its double-edged role across biological systems.

Hyperplasticity in Engineering and Material Science

In engineering, hyperplasticity develops a more formal meaning. In simple terms, it refers to a unified way of describing how materials permanently change shape when they are pushed, stretched, or compressed. Technically, it is defined as a generalized constitutive framework for plastic deformation based on thermodynamics. Houlsby and Puzrin (2007) introduced a thermodynamically grounded method to derive material behavior from scalar potentials (ideas of free energy and dissipation, which can be thought of as the stored fuel of a material and the energy it loses as heat or friction). This makes sure that the math used to model materials does not break the laws of energy---hence, the term “hyperplasticity,” by analogy with “hyperelasticity.” Their framework has since been extended to model kinematic hardening (when a material stiffens as it is worked), continuous yielding (when it keeps deforming under stress), and the behaviors of clays and other geomaterials (Houlsby & Puzrin, 2000). Although these concepts enhance model accuracy and ensure consistency with physical laws, they also add significant complexity, like using a very advanced blueprint to predict how soil under a building will shift. Though not always necessary, the concept of hyperplasticity in engineering is powerful when precision is critical (Zhang et al., 2015).

Why Hyperplasticity Appears Across Disciplines

Across very different fields, the word hyperplasticity is used when ordinary plasticity and ordinary adaptability do not quite capture what is happening. In neuroscience, it is invoked when the brain’s ability to rewire seems amplified to a point that can be both powerful and destabilizing. In medicine and biology, it is used to describe tissue growth or remodeling that may start as adaptive but can cross into pathology. In engineering, it refers to a higher‑order framework for modeling how materials permanently change shape. Though these examples look unrelated, they share a theme: hyperplasticity signals a state of intensified change that demands balance.

By drawing these strands together, we can see hyperplasticity as a unifying idea that links brain science, biology, and engineering. In every case, the same principle holds: an excess of adaptability can be both an advantage and a vulnerability. Whether we are looking at a neuron, a tumor, or the soil beneath a building, the word points us to the delicate line between flexibility that sustains and flexibility that destabilizes. This framing also sets the stage for exploring how hyperneuroplasticity functions as a lived, trait‑like expression of this same dynamic tension.

Framing into Hyperneuroplasticity

Extending the concept, hyperneuroplasticity describes when hyperplasticity is an enduring baseline orientation toward heightened adaptability in the body and specifically, the nervous system. In plain terms, it refers to systems wired to change quickly and deeply, often reorganizing patterns of thought, emotion, and learning faster than most. This can mean accelerated cognition and creativity, where ideas link and reconfigure with unusual speed. It can also mean heightened sensitivity, which enriches perception while sometimes feeling overwhelming. It can also foster neurodivergent resilience, giving people the ability to adapt their identities and emotional landscapes in ways that allow growth and healing.

Viewed this way, hyperplasticity is a way of being that carries extraordinary creativity and real vulnerability, requiring balance and understanding rather than cure. It also illustrates a broader principle that runs through the entire conversation: adaptation must be balanced with stability. Too much rigidity may lead to brittleness, while excessive flexibility risks chaos. The essence of a thriving system, whether brain, cell, or material, lies in dynamic yet coherent adaptability. By bringing the discussion of hyperplasticity full circle, hyperneuroplasticity ties the scientific, medical, and engineering examples back to lived experience, showing how this concept matters not only in theory but in the day‑to‑day realities of neurodivergent lives.

References

Enticott, P. G., Kennedy, H. A., Rinehart, N. J., Tonge, B. J., Bradshaw, J. L., & Fitzgerald, P. B. (2015). Understanding repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS, a noninvasive brain stimulation technique) and its potential applications in autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 6, 124. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00124

Gowen, E., et al. (2024). Investigating somatosensory cortex hyperplasticity in autism using TMS-EEG: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial. PLOS ONE, 19(5), e0305013. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305013

Hanahan, D., & Weinberg, R. A. (2011). Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell, 144(5), 646–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013

Houlsby, G. T., & Puzrin, A. M. (2000). A thermomechanical framework for constitutive models for rate-independent dissipative materials. International Journal of Plasticity, 16(9), 1017–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(99)00079-5

Houlsby, G. T., & Puzrin, A. M. (2007). Principles of hyperplasticity: An approach to plasticity theory based on thermodynamic principles. Springer.

Janssen, A. M., Oostra, R. J., van der Meer, L., van der Werf, Y. D., & Tucha, O. (2021). Aberrant neuroplasticity in adults with autism spectrum disorder revealed by TMS-EEG. Biological Psychiatry, 90(5), 340–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.04.008

Kirk, I. J., Wilson, A. J., & Lincoln, N. B. (2013). Evidence of hyperplasticity in adults with autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 182. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00182

Rinaldi, T., Perrodin, C., & Markram, H. (2008). Hyper-connectivity and hyper-plasticity in the medial prefrontal cortex in the valproic acid model of autism. Frontiers in Neural Circuits, 2, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.04.004.2008

Tijms, B. M., et al. (2020). Pathophysiological subtypes of Alzheimer’s disease based on cerebrospinal fluid proteomics. Brain, 143(12), 3776–3792. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa325

Zhang, H., Hu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2015). Hyperplastic constitutive models and applications in geotechnical engineering. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 52(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-015-9313-7